Young Married Life

8 Posts authored by: Heather_Koerner
4

 

I was watching the Olympics bobsledding competition the other night and got to wondering, "What exactly are the qualifications for the person/people that sit in the back?"

 

It looked like the "back seaters" had some awesome calves for the two to four second start, but after that ... what? It appeared (to me, at least) that they just sit in the back, heads tucked, for the entire ride. That the entire race was dependent upon the skill of the driver.

 

Since I know absolutely nothing about bobsledding, I'm sure I'm wrong. There may, and probably is, much more to the "back of the bobsled" person's job than what I see. But I also got to thinking (because I'm weird that way) about submission.

 

I think when nonbelievers, and even some believers, hear about biblical passages such as Ephesians 5 or Colossians 3 or 1 Peter 3 where wives are called upon to submit to their husbands they think of my version of bobsledding. The wife is just along for the ride. The husband drives with his head facing forward, not worrying about those in the back as long as they have their heads tucked.

 

But I've learned after more than a decade of marriage, that submission doesn't really look like that at all. With apologies to those who aren't figure skating fans, I've found submission to be much closer to pairs skating. We're face to face, engaging each other. We're communicating, practicing, perfecting (or, in our case, leaning upon the Lord to perfect us). But there are still definite roles. His is to lead our family. Mine is to support that leadership.

 

That support may look different in different situations. Sometimes helping. Sometimes advising. Sometimes listening. Sometimes gently challenging. But always affirming that the only way for this dance to work is for us to be intentionally engaging each other and to embrace, rather than fight, our God-given roles. It's not about being in the back seat with no control over where this crazy, out-of-control thing goes. Instead, it's face to face, with (metaphorically) hands clasped and his arm around my waist, mine upon his shoulder.

256 Views 4 Comments Permalink Tags: sports, roles, submission, early_marriage
4

When my hubbie and I had been married about two years, our Sunday School class went through a book called His Needs, Her Needs: Building An Affair-Proof Marriage by Willard F. Harley Jr.

 

"This book was written to educate you in the care of your spouse," Harley writes in the introduction. He then goes on to list (from his experience as a marital counselor) the five main needs of a husband and the five main needs of a wife. That book was really eye opening for me -- in many ways. But one of the "takeaways" that I have to this day was Harley's number two need of a husband: a recreational companion.

 

Harley writes:

 

"It is not uncommon for women, when they are single, to join men in pursuing their interests. They find themselves hunting, fishing, playing football, and watching movies they would never have chosen on their own. After marriage wives often try to interest their husbands in activities more to their own liking. If their attempts fail, they may encourage their husbands to continue their recreational activities without them. I consider that option very dangerous to a marriage, because men place suprising importance on having their wives as recreational companions. The TV stereotypes paint the opposite picture, showing husbands out with the boys on fishing trips saying, 'It doesn't get any better than this.' My counseling files say it can get a lot better. In fact, among the five basic male needs, spending recreational time with his wife is second only to sex for the typical husband."

 

Something about that really connected with me. As I looked back over our dating time and early marriage, I could see that my hubbie seemed to get energized when we shared recreational moments together. So, I began to try to be intentional about that.

 

It wasn't always easy. I didn't play golf, he did. So we had several "driving range dates" where he would teach, I would try and we'd laugh a lot. He played basketball, I didn't. But I made sure that I was at every league game he played. We both liked football, so we got season tickets to our alma mater. Even just walking together in the evenings proved fruitful. I started to realize that we had as many (if not more) great talks doing things "side by side" as we did sitting down "face to face."

 

When kids came along, it became a little bit more of a challenge. But, even then, we bought a garage sale hiking backback and a jogging stroller and hit the trails. Or I would bring a toddler and a baby along with me to those basketball games. Or we will get a babysitter to go do a couples scramble golf night. (Love the "scramble" concept, can I just say? Way less pressure!)

 

My husband too, has made an effort to take on a few of my interests. There is some musical theatre he just can't stomach, but he took me to see the national tour of Wicked this last summer and we both really enjoyed it.

 

Currently, I'm learning to appreciate the ins and outs of fantasy football. Sometimes I cheer on his players. Sometimes I'll give him reports in between Sunday chores ("Hey, hon, Adrian just scored a touchdown!"). Sometimes I just fall asleep with him on the couch as he watches. But it all works -- and I know he appreciates that I am willing to share that with him.

 

Below is a picture of us recreating last weekend. We rented a cabin a few hours away from our home and spent time hiking and enjoying the views with our two kids.

 

 

In For Women Only: What You Need to Know About the Inner Lives of Men, Shaunti Feldhahn quotes one husband who says, "The woman having fun with her husband is incredibly attractive. If you see a woman out playing golf with her husband, I guarantee that all the other guys are jealous. Getting out and having fun together falls off in marriage because of various responsibilities, but men still want to play with their wives."

 

Harley writes it this way in his book, "The couple that plays together, stays together."

 

For my marriage, I've found that to be good advice.

429 Views 4 Comments Permalink Tags: needs, husband, recreation, communication_spouse, hiking, early_marriage, two_do_life
6

Six different celebrations. Three states. Over a thousand miles on the car.

 

That was hubbie and my's first Christmas as a married couple.

 

I'm not sure what we were thinking. Probably that, since we had married and moved to a different state, we owed it to our families and ourselves to bring as little "disruption" to the holidays as possible. So we became uber-planners. Rather than making choices where to spend the holidays, possibly leaving someone, somewhere in the family shortchanged, we decided to cram it all in. Yep, every holiday event we had attended as singles, we would now attend as a married couple. We would be paragons of Christmas spirit. The more, the better. Or so we thought.

 

For a couple of years, we kept it up. After all, we didn't see our families nearly as much as we used to. The holidays were the times everyone got together. What else could we do? So, our Christmas consisted of my old college, 3-foot, articifical Christmas tree with a few lights that we'd turn off on our way out the door to our marathon trips.

 

I don't think it ever occurred to us to slow down, or discuss or focus on building our own holiday traditions. It was almost as if we could "leave and cleave" during every other month but December. We still, in a way, were tied to the traditions of our youth -- forgetting to consider that our own parents probably had to make some choices along the way.

 

I can remember the moment that it stopped. We were about halfway along the highway between two of the celebrations. We had our two-month-old daughter in the back seat, inches of ice on the road, and were creeping along an interstate at about 25 mph. The stress was rising in the pit of my stomach as I realized we would never make it on time.

 

This is crazy, I thought. We simply cannot keep this up anymore. And the next year, it did stop.

 

We didn't stop seeing our families. We didn't get arrogant or adamant. We just started being intentional.

 

In his article, "Holidays and the In-Laws," Willard Wooten gives some good advice to young couples about how to tread carefully on the emotional ice of Christmas. His suggestions include:

 

  • Sit down with your spouse and share how you feel about the holidays. (Driving, white-knuckled, through an ice storm with a newborn in the backseat was probably not the best time for me to come to my holiday epiphany. Looking back, my husband and I should have had some discussions way before the holidays came around. We should have talked about what was best for our families and for us.)
  • Explain how you spent the holidays as a child.
  • Consider how your parents and others may wish to have you involved. (It was important, I think, that even after realizing we were stretched too thin, we didn't simply stamp our feet and demand our own way on everything about the holidays. After we began discussing expectations with our extended family, emphasizing how we wanted them to be an important part of our holidays, we found them open and flexible.)
  • Agree on how you as a couple would like to establish your own holiday traditions. (This is where we really dropped the ball. By making the entire emphasis on our "old" Christmas traditions, my hubby and I were losing something special: the chance to create new ones, for our own family, that were special to us. Now, we have declared Christmas morning to be our own. We celebrate it, every year, at our home. I cook brunch. We run around in our pajamas for a good half day. It's our time. And it makes the time we spend with others much more enjoyable and relaxing.)
  • Be open to changing your plan as needed. (I really need this. As a "tradition fixator," I tend to think everything has to be the same, every year, for the rest of our lives. But it doesn't. We should keep some traditions year to year. But that doesn't mean that one year we might not spend Christmas snuggled up in a cabin in the Rockies. The holidays are for celebrating, not for incarcerating. Flexibility -- note to self.)

 

And, although Wooten doesn't mention it, I found it's been important over the years to be aware that I am the wife. And, as the wife, I am the designated social director. That means, when it comes to holidays, I need to be especially intentional about my husband's family. Too often, I've seen couples (and had the urge myself to) end up giving the wife's family the first and the best of the holiday time, while the husband's family gets the scraps. Or, even if the husband's family is included fairly, the wife is observably less merry at that particular Christmas.

 

It can be a lot on our plates. But with some patience, planning and compassion, we've made the holidays work. Sometimes we stretch ourselves for others. Sometimes we set some boundaries. But we want to treat the holiday in a way that honors and glorifies Christ. He said to love our neighbors (and that means our families, too) as we love ourselves. When we do that, it is a very merry Christmas.

485 Views 6 Comments Permalink Tags: traditions, holidays, inlaws, christmas
1

In his book, Money and Marriage God's Way, Howard Dayton tells the story of Mike and Yolanda, a couple married six years who have a pretty successful marriage, save one big problem:

 

Mike's domineering parents constantly interjected themselves and their strong opinions into the couple's household affairs. Even though this was a major source of stress for Yolanda, Mike was reluctant to confront his parents ...

 

Why was Mike so reluctant?

 

... for fear of losing their financial help. In fact, his parents were using money as a tool to control the young couple.

 

Thomas Stanley and William Danko tell a similar story in their book, The Millionaire Next Door, about Beth and her husband:

 

Beth and her family live in "subsidized housing." Mr. and Mrs. Jones made a sizable down payment on Beth's home. They also dole out thousands of dollars to Beth each year for housing and other expenses ... there is some confusion about home ownership between Beth and her parents. It seems that Mother is always at Beth's -- invited or not. And Mother was more involved with the choice of Beth's home than Beth was....

 

It is difficult under such conditions for Beth and her husband to develop much self-confidence. [Her] parents, especially her father, do not show respect for Beth's husband.

 

It may be that you don't receive financial help from your parents or in-laws. But if you do, or if you may some day, it's helpful to determine: Just exactly what financial help is helpful (if at all)?

 

Stanley and Danko have both researched the lives of those who accept financial gifts from their parents and they point out 4 major concerns:

 

  1. Giving precipitates more consumption than saving and investing.
  2. Gift receivers in general never fully distinguish between their wealth and the wealth of their gift-giving parents.
  3. Gift receivers are significantly more dependent on credit than are nonreceivers.
  4. Receivers of gifts invest much less money than do nonreceivers.

 

Some of those research findings may seem to go against common sense. After all, if you are receiving large gifts, wouldn't you have more money to save and invest? Why would you need more credit? Stanley and Danko have found that, statistically, most gifts simply result in more consumption. Not only that, but they lead to more continuous consumption. The next gift will probably be coming soon, the son or daughter thinks, so why not finance that TV or borrow for that car?

 

Howard Dayton writes:

 

Parents should encourage their married children to transfer their dependence to the Lord and to each other....

 

This doesn't mean that parents cannot offer financial help. Bev and I decided that we would not help our married children increase their lifestyle, but we would help them pay off their home mortgages by matching the principle reduction part of their payment. We have also contributed toward their investing.

 

Children, on the other hand, should continue to honor their parents and seek their counsel without remaining emotionally or financially dependent on them. Husband and wife need to cleave to one another.

 

So, if you and your spouse are receiving financial gifts, it might be helpful to ask yourselves a few questions:

 

  • Are these gifts translating into unhealthy influence on our decisions?
  • Are the gifts a flash point for arguments between us? If so, are they really worth it?
  • Are we simply increasing our consumption with these gifts or are we building healthy financial habits?
  • If the gifts stopped, would we be just fine? (In other words, do you "act your wage"?)
480 Views 1 Comments Permalink Tags: home, in-laws, finances, marriage_expectations
5

My hubbie and I were married three years when he got transferred to Colorado. Within a few months I found myself with a mountain view, a new job and one seriously long commute from Denver to Colorado Springs. A 52-minute commute, not that I was counting.

 

It wasn't that I minded the drive. As I said, I had some nice views along the way and a job I was excited about. Still, I was relieved to find, within a few weeks of starting my job, that there was another fellow Denverite making the drive to work as well. Suddenly, visions of carpooling and reduced gas bills were dancing in my head.

 

But when I approached him about sharing the long drive, he was less than enthusiastic. Though he admitted the logic of it, and appreciated my thinking of him ... No, he didn't think he'd take me up on my carpooling offer. I was slightly miffed.

 

Why not? I asked.

 

He explained very graciously. He and his wife had made an agreement -- they would not spend time with members of the opposite sex one-on-one. They felt it was a wise way to protect their marriage.

 

I was still slightly miffed. It's not like I'm on the prowl for you, I thought. This is about practicality.

 

That night, my hubbie and I discussed the situation. We admitted that the gas savings would have been nice, but wanted to respect this couple's wishes. Oh, well.

 

But, for both of us, the simmer process started. Maybe this couple really was wise. Maybe, with some things in marriage, a good defense is a good offense. Maybe maturity is not about pushing right up to the boundaries, but taking a few giant, mother-may-I steps back away from them.

 

About a year later, after some prayer and some more discussions, my husband and I decided. This couple was smart. We wanted to be proactive about protecting our marriage as well. We would do the same.

 

Most of the time, it works really well. Sometimes, it doesn't. Like the time I was supposed to go on a work trip to California with two male colleagues and one backed out ... 30 minutes before the plane was to take off. (I still went on that trip, but called hubbie and discussed it first.) Or the time that hubbie was supposed to go to lunch with a female and a male co-worker and the male, you guessed it, backed out in the parking lot. (Hubbie explained the situation to the female co-worker and rescheduled the lunch.)

 

But, even with the occasional messiness, it's a commitment I'm glad we've made. Not because it's a requirement, but because we think it's wise.

 

Over at the Stuff Christians Like blog, Jonathan Acuff writes:

 

I don't know. I don't have the answer on this one. Just the idea that things get a little awkward when you get married and have to figure out friendships with the opposite sex. But of the two camps, "Jeez you're such a Puritan, loosen up" and "Better safe than sorry, can a dude drive me to the airport," I know which one I want to fall into. Because no one ever wakes up and says, "Today I'm having an affair." Affairs are slow burn decisions, with a wick a mile long made of little steps and little compromises.

 

I agree. I don't think hubbie and I have got "the" answer. But we're trying to stop that wick before there's ever a chance to spark. What about you? Is there anything you do to set up boundaries around your marriage?

676 Views 5 Comments Permalink Tags: marriage, affair, sexual_infidelity, affairs, work, commute
0

In a recent Newsweek article titled "Marriage is Hard: The Religious Right Admits It," Lisa Miller compares two men: Billy Graham, probably the most respected Christian figure of the last century, and John Ensign, a Nevada senator embroiled in an adultery scandal.

 

The first, she writes, was a powerful man who was away from his wife and children more often than he was with them. So,

 

"Aware of the significance of his reputation and convinced of the moral value of the Gospel message, he took precautions to guard against his own human weakness. He gave his ministry colleagues explicit instructions: never leave me alone in a room with a woman who is not my wife."

 

The second was also a powerful man who was away from his wife and children often,

 

"If only someone had given John Ensign similar advice. Or if someone did, that he'd heeded it."

 

Miller writes that Ensign is seen by many as the "latest example of what so many see as the failure of the right to retain any credibility on the marriage question." After all, she argues, why would he vote to support a constitutional amendment to "protect" marriage but fail to protect his own wife and children from public humiliation?

 

This argument isn't new. The world sometimes delights to tell Christians that we should not speak to a certain issue because our actions don't always match our words. Sometimes our response is to simply reply that we, too, are sinners. But sinners saved by grace. We don't spout our own personal opinions, but honor and uphold the standards of a righteous Lord. And that's correct and true.

 

But as I read Miller's piece something resonated.

 

She wrote:

 

"Of course, every person who utters "till death do us part" and then separates is, in a sense, conceding defeat. But when evangelicals are leading the charge in the marriage movement (and now, the anti-gay-marriage movement) arguing that sacred unions between one man and one woman are good for society because they're good for children, one would hope that they'd have worked out the kinks a little better than the rest of us."

 

There are some statements I would take issue with Miller about. But on her overall point, I absolutely agree. If I, as a believer, am going to proclaim the sacredness of marriage (which it is), I better take it seriously myself. And I better fight not just for marriage as an institution (which I should), but for my individual marriage as well.

 

I need to understand that while working hard to promote a good marriage helps myself, my spouse and my children, that isn't where it ends, or even what's of most importance. My marriage, like my entire life, is a witness to the Gospel. Ephesians 5 tells me that my marriage is a symbol of Christ and the Church. When my marriage flourishes, God is glorified.

 

I am no Billy Graham. But am I, like him, aware of the significance of my own marriage as a testimony? Am I, like him, convinced of the Gospel message and its power?

 

Miller writes, "Billy Graham, though politically astute, was rarely self-serving. He knew how to protect his children from his chaotic life—and he did."

 

Makes me wonder, What can I do today?

311 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: marriage
2

During the first years of my marriage, I did a lot of mental finger pointing.

 

It's him. If he would only do this, our marriage would be better. When he learns how to clean the kitchen (to my specifications), we'll be fine. If he would just know what I want (as he should, of course), we wouldn't have any problems.

 

But here's what I've learned. Sometimes, it is him. But most of the time, it's me. It's wanting things my way. It's wanting him to have my priorities. It's focusing on my needs.

 

And it's this human selfishness, self-focus and self-worship that makes marriage so hard, says Paul David Tripp.

 

Over at The Gender Blog, Garrett E. Wishall writes a summary of two presentations that Paul David Tripp gave at a recent conference. Wishall writes:

 

Selfishness is a problem for 10 out of 10 people, Tripp said, which obviously has an adverse affect on marriage. In contrast, 2 Corinthians 5:14-15 teaches that Christ died for people so that they might no longer live for themselves but for Him, Tripp noted. To work through a self-focused perspective toward a Christ-honoring approach to life and marriage, Tripp said, spouses must uncover and be honest about their selfishness.

 

So, first, we need to recognize our own selfishness. Then, we need to realize the effect it is having on our marriages.

 

"The war between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of self is the deeper war that is the reason for all those horizontal battles that take place between us," [Tripp] said. "It is only when you gain ground at the deeper level that you can gain ground at the horizontal level."

 

How do we gain ground at the deeper level?

 

To grow in relational unity, Tripp said, spouses must heed Jesus' words in Matthew 6:33 to seek first His kingdom. Progress can be made in marriages when both spouses seek to live for the same King instead of for two different sets of self-centered pursuits.

 

"Jesus died to break the bondage that I have to my passions and my desires," he said. "Do you know what it means to seek His kingdom? You (husband) wake up in the morning and say, ‘today, I am going to look for specific, concrete opportunities to love my wife.' (Wife) you say ‘I want to know my husband, I want to know where he struggles, and I want to know ways that I can serve in him in love.'"

 

After more than a decade of marriage, I still struggle with this. I've seen how amazing a marriage can be when self is put on the back burner. But I've also seen how the smallest things can make my selfishness rear its head.

 

Case in point: the dishes this weekend. As my husband and I scurried around Saturday morning to get kids and house ready for a visit from my parents, I stuck my head into the kitchen during a break in combing and ponytailing duty.

 

"Hey, babe. Can you please empty the dishwasher and put those dirty dishes in it?"

 

"Well, hon," he said, "I just spent 5 minutes rinsing the dirty dishes and stacking them in the sink neatly so you wouldn't need to worry about them."

 

My husband knows me well. Dishes are my thing. Deep breath. How do I react? Am I thankful for a husband who, without asking, knows my priorities and attempts to serve me? Or do I rail because he did not read my mind exactly?

 

Pathetic ... but my initial attitude was much more the latter than the former. I do need Christ, every single day, to transform my attitude and my heart. I do need to fight the war at the deeper level.

 

Yep, it's me.

538 Views 2 Comments Permalink Tags: marriage_expectations
1

The Year of Grain

Posted by Heather_Koerner Sep 28, 2009

"Wow," I thought. "A whole year of grain.... Wow."

 

I was in Germany. Specifically a picturesque little town named Rothenburg where every street was bricked, every window had an overflowing flower box and a centuries-old wall that used to protect the city now served as a place for tourists to walk and see the amazing countryside views. My hubbie and I were on the Night Watchman's Tour--following around a man in traditional "town night watchman" garb and learning interesting facts about the town.

 

That night, I remember being delighted and intrigued by the wealth of information our guide provided. But there's only one tidbit that I remember to this day, nine years later.

 

It was that each town household, no matter how rich, no matter how poor, was required to keep one year's supply of grain on hand at all times. No excuses. No exceptions. There was even a town official, the guide told us, whose job it was to inspect each family each year to ensure that they had their supply.

 

The reason? Siege.

 

Evidently, the town's wall was very effective. It had withstood attacks for centuries (right up until the advanced machinery of World War II). When enemies could not compromise the wall, they would lay siege to the town, surrounding it on all sides, refusing to let anyone or anything get close to it. The town had a reliable water supply, our guide said, but a lack of food would have driven the town to panic, starvation and defeat.

 

Solution: every family, a whole year of grain. By the time a year was over, most enemies had given up, their forces quite tired of the Rothenburg countryside and war.

 

The townspeople had no idea if, or when, siege would come. But they were ready. Every single one of them.

 

That got me to thinking, am I ready for a mini-siege in my own life? No one plans to lose your job, have your car engine blow or be laid up by surgery or illness. But maybe that's the problem: We don't plan.

 

According to a recent article at MSN Money,

 

"Experts have traditionally recommended having an emergency fund that could last three to six months, but HSBC’s new survey finds that only 39 percent of respondents are prepared for this."

 

A majority of those with household income of less than $50,000 could survive on their savings for less than a month. Those who earned $100,000 or more? Almost a third had less than three months.

 

Crown Financial Ministries writes,

 

The Scriptures encourage us to plan for the unexpected and equate planning with being wise. “Go to the ant, O sluggard, observe her ways and be wise, which, having no chief, officer or ruler, prepares her food in the summer and gathers her provision in the harvest” (Proverbs 6:6-8).

 

So what about you? Have you and your spouse set up an emergency fund? Do you have your year of grain?

234 Views 1 Comments Permalink Tags: finances