Currently Being Moderated
1

The ad hominem logical fallacy occurs when someone rejects an argument made by another by criticizing the person (by name calling, etc.) who makes the argument rather than giving good reasons to reject the argument itself.  Ad hominem is a Latin term that literally means “to the man.”

 

In this three-minute video William Lane Craig calmly answers an agitated atheist who attempts to provide examples of when Dr. Craig has been guilty of ad hominem attacks.

 

After you watch this video, answer the following question:


If an atheist were to write a book that was not well argued, and you explained the book's main deficiencies, then would it be an ad hominem fallacy for you to say that the author displays himself as “sophomoric and unsophisticated” in that book?

353 Views


Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Apr 22, 2012 12:07 PM Guest Michael  says:
I don't see how the person was agitated or was even an atheist. Also, Craig was wrong. An ad hominem is when: (1) appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect or (2) marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made (Merriam-Webster). It says nothing about having to make such comments in a formal debate as Craig said. Each of the instances mentioned happened were made as a response to arguments.You left out a few of the comments Craig admitted saying:

 

"weasley"
"oiley"
"lacking intellectual substance"
some "crank"
"unsophisticated"
"inept"
"sophomoric"
"silly"
"ignorant"

Actions