Plugged In

11 Posts authored by: Bob_Smithouser

envelope.jpgIf you tune in for this year’s Academy Awards telecast, listen for the phrase in ceremonies held earlier.  Simple words rich with meaning.  For starters, this is a warning.  It says, “The following awards categories were deemed too much of a ratings-kill for inclusion on prime time TV.”  Best Left-Handed Director of a Foreign-Language Stop-Motion Documentary Short?  Great time to grab a snack or put the dog out.

 

Furthermore, “in ceremonies held earlier” is the motion picture industry’s way of reminding us that three hours isn’t nearly enough time for Hollywood to adequately congratulate itself.  Indeed, the Oscars are the black-tie equivalent of a progressive dinner.  Sunday night is dessert.  Which got me thinking, With all of those categories, why not a few more?  And which ones would I like to see?  This is what I came up with:

 

3-D Movie Actually Worth the Surcharge: In an attempt to lure people away from their HDTVs and into the theater, 3-D seems to be the wave of the future. But more often than not, today’s 3-D movies deliver just enough added dimension to give my 8-year-old motion sickness.  The Avatars of the world are few and far between.  In fact, films shot in traditional 2-D (Clash of the Titans and the next two Harry Potter films) are now trying to cash in on the Avatar craze by adding 3-D as an afterthought.   So how ‘bout we reward filmmakers who make full use of the technology instead of peddling the 21st century equivalent of colorized black-and-white movies?

 

Best Picture That People Paid to See: Personally, I think increasing the number of Best Picture nominees from five to ten was a mistake. It just adds clutter in the name of bringing in a populist film or two that wouldn’t have made it otherwise (District 9, The Blind Side).  Why not create a category to honor those quality movies everyone flocked to see?  There’s something to be said for a well-crafted blockbuster that grossed, say, $200 million.  If ABC wants to keep Oscar viewers around ‘til midnight, this is the award that would do it, all the while letting Tinseltown nominate five populist films (Star Trek anyone?) instead of two.

 

Best Picture With a Sociopolitical Agenda: Most years, one of the coveted Best Picture nominations gets wasted on a so-so “message flick” lauded for championing a social agenda or political issue close to Hollywood’s heart.  An inconvenient truth?  Perhaps, but it’s also a fact.  My solution: Just give ‘em their own category.  Let true entertainment dominate the major categories and leave those feature-length sociopolitical PSAs to duke it out amongst themselves.

 

Best Performance by a Voice Actor: Have you ever been so impressed by a vocal performance in an animated film that you thought it deserved special recognition?  I sure have.  But because it’s not a traditional “role” the Academy doesn’t acknowledge it.  With animation maturing as an art form, this would be a great time to give those actors their due.  No need to separate awards by gender or create a “supporting” subdivision.  Lump examples of the year’s best voice work together and may the best man/woman/comic animal sidekick win.

 

Yessir, if I ran the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, those are a few categories I’d propose.  How about you?  What do you think would spice up the Oscar telecast or, for that matter, one of those “ceremonies held earlier”?

 

Be sure to tune in to this week’s Official Plugged In Podcast for a fun roundtable discussion of this year’s Best Picture nominees, plus Oscar trivia and more.  Also, join us right here on Oscar night to participate in our live blog!

1,206 Views 6 Comments Permalink Oscar Categories I'd Like to SeeTwitter Facebook Tags: movie, awards, oscars, animation, blockbuster, 3d
AutoTuneEVO.JPGWhile watching the recent Grammy Awards telecast, I was reminded of a fascinating technological breakthrough. No, not the iPad, though I'm sure the free product placement during Stephen Colbert's monologue had Steve Jobs doing cartwheels. Rather, I'm referring to Auto-Tune.

 

If you've never heard of Auto-Tune, well, that's just fine with the music industry. They'd prefer it that way. You see, without altering a vocal performance in any other discernable fashion, Auto-Tune (the creation of Antares Audio Technologies) manages to correct intonation problems, giving a singer perfect pitch. Tired voice? Feeling sick? Mediocre talent? No problem. Now those vocal flaws can be smoothed out in real time with no one being the wiser.

 

"It usually ends up just like plastic surgery," a Grammy-winning recording engineer told Time. "You haul out Auto-Tune to make one thing better, but then it's very hard to resist the temptation to spruce up the whole vocal, give everything a little nip-tuck. … Every singer now presumes that you'll just run their voice through the box."

 

Of course, we're all aware that tinkering goes on when an artist lays down less-than-perfect vocal tracks for an upcoming CD. In such cases, the producer, label and singer operate with an understanding befitting the Las Vegas chamber of commerce: What happens in the recording studio stays in the recording studio. And fans tend to accept that, eager to own the most polished product possible. But what about live performances?

 

Last week at the Grammys, Black Eyed Peas, Jamie Foxx and Lil Wayne all reportedly relied on Auto-Tune onstage. Foxx even felt the need to apologize for it. Some use the device overtly, for the funky, machine-like quality it can lend to their voices. But for others, this controversial technology is becoming to the music biz what steroids and HGH are to major league baseball: a shortcut to excellence. So far there's been no word on whether Jose Canseco will be naming names in an Auto-Tune tell-all book.

 

This practice isn't without its casualties. These days, when someone sings live and is a little out of tune (like Taylor Swift crooning one of her hits during a Grammy duet with Stevie Nicks), people cringe even more than they might have years ago. Why? Because so much music is doctored these days that audiences' expectations have changed.

 

We've become a perfectionist society, even if the perfection we crave isn't quite real. Beautiful women are surgically enhanced, then Photoshopped before being allowed on a magazine cover. Athletes get their muscles from a lab to compete at a certain level or produce the gaudy statistics demanded of them. And now singers are taking a shortcut that, while not as egregious as Milli Vanilli-style lip-synching, compromises authenticity in the interest of impeccable quality. Where does it all end?

 

When I was talking about Auto-Tune with a colleague of mine, he suggested the device might be more akin to spell-checking than steroids. Many of us use a variety of artificial means—be it our morning caffeine fix to our smart phones—to improve our career performance.

 

I'm not convinced. I think using Auto-Tune is, quite simply, cheating. It occurs any time a modern innovation is covertly used to cut corners and enhance performance. So why should we be shocked when students confuse the downloading of a term paper from the Internet with "research"? I don't support plagiarism. But is it really that much different? And at what point is it better for us, as a culture, to keep it real even if it's not perfect?

1,151 Views 6 Comments Permalink Auto-Tune: Ditch the (Perfect) PitchTwitter Facebook Tags: music, cheating, grammys, auto-tune, taylor_swift, jamie_foxx, black_eyed_peas, lil_wayne

Peoplemagcover.jpgA weary roll of the eyes and shake of the head. That’s my typical reaction to supermarket tabloids and shallow fan mags trumpeting the latest celebrity wedding.

 

It’s not because these cleverly nicknamed bride-and-groom tandems (can we stop with the Tomkats, Bennifers and Brangelinas already?) celebrate their nuptials with gaudy excess and guest lists that read like a Golden Globes ballot. Hey, they’re entitled to choose their friends. And if they want to spend the gross national product of Guam on a party, so be it. What breaks my heart is knowing that, based on the track record of celebrity marriages, most of these high-profile partnerships are destined to fail because they’re built on foundations of Jell-O.  

 

So it might surprise you to know that I thoroughly enjoyed reading People magazine’s recent cover story about 22-year-old pop star Kevin Jonas’ marriage to his “best friend,” Danielle Deleasa: His Brooks Brothers tux. Her Vera Wang gown. How he sent his real-life Cinderella a pair of glass slippers (in her size) just before the ceremony. The tears. The toasts. The first dance. I loved it all.

 

Why did I suddenly become such a softie who couldn’t wait to share the colorful photo spread with my 12-year-old daughter? Because it’s obvious that the blushing couple and their proud families understand the eternal significance of marriage. This wasn’t an impulsive stunt or shrewd career move. Kevin and Danielle were raised in Christian homes, healthy environments that, according to her mom, were remarkably similar. And the ceremony was performed by Kevin’s dad, an ordained minister who also happened to be Danielle’s childhood pastor.

 

Does any of that guarantee a successful marriage? No, but it sure improves the odds, especially by showbiz standards.

 

On his wedding day, Kevin said he realized that the vow he was about to take would forever change his life and relationships, including the longtime bond with his musical brothers, Joe and Nick. You remember the Jonas Brothers; they’re the band that comedian Russell Brand mocked during a 2008 MTV awards show for their abstinence pledge. Brand’s comments made headlines, as did the immediate response by singer Jordin Sparks, who defended the boys onstage. Fittingly, Sparks was also on hand Dec. 19 to hear Kevin and Danielle recite the pledge that would make all of that waiting worthwhile.

2,854 Views 2 Comments Permalink Congrats, Mr. and Mrs. JonasTwitter Facebook Tags: marriage, abstinence, wedding, celebrity, jonas, kevin_jonas, russell_brand
Stealing cars. Killing cops. Assaulting prostitutes and swiping their cash. That's the world of Grand Theft Auto,an enormously popular series of M-rated video games. You may have heard of them. Maybe even played them. But did you happen to catch Conan O'Brien's reference to GTA on The Tonight Show recently? He turned one of the day's headlines into the following joke:

 

In Boston, a woman called the police because her 14-year-old son wouldn't stop playing Grand Theft Auto at 2:30 in the morning. Out of habit, the boy hit both cops with a baseball bat and then drove off in their car.

 

The audience laughed. I can only assume they were unaware of another headline from a few years back that made O'Brien's barb, at least to me, feel as insensitive as a one-liner about 9-11.

 

GTA.JPGOn June 7, 2003, an 18-year-old Grand Theft Auto fan named Devin Moore got picked up by police on suspicion of stealing a car. He had no criminal history and cooperated with authorities. But once inside the Fayette, Ala., police station, he snapped. He grabbed an officer's .40 caliber Glock automatic and—with great precision—killed three men, all with shots to the head.  Then Moore stole a squad car. Some experts are convinced he was acting out in a stressful moment what he'd rehearsed while playing Grand Theft Auto for hours on end. Or as 60 Minutes put it, "day and night for months."

 

Some people might argue, Lots of people play GTA and don't kill anybody. Why should we assume that the game had any influence? Maybe it's because when authorities caught up with Moore, he said, "Life is a video game. Everybody's got to die sometime." Unfortunately, in this case, the casualties were officers Arnold Strickland, James Crump, and dispatcher Ace Mealer.

 

Conan O'Brien and his audience must have missed that headline. They probably had no idea how closely his quip reflected a real-life tragedy. At least I hope they didn't.

789 Views 1 Comments Permalink Headlines and Punch LinesTwitter Facebook Tags: discernment, crime, violence, video_games, influence, grand_theft_auto, gaming, gta
Every year, record labels release an avalanche of new Christmas products. It’s a holiday tradition right alongside "batteries not included" and leftover fruitcake. But for every bona fide classic, we’re peddled dozens of discs from artists churning out the obligatory seasonal résumé item. So I wondered, How is a person looking for new music supposed to find the really good CDs—you know, the ones people never get tired of listening to? Everyone on the Plugged In team weighed in, and here are our own time-tested favorites:

 

Bob Hoose, associate editor: Bing Crosby’s Merry Christmas (re-released as White Christmas) came out in 1945 and is considered by many—myself included—to be the quintessential Christmas album. It’s incredible. It features Bing doing his Decca Music classics such as "White Christmas" and "I’ll Be Home for Christmas." He harmonizes with the Andrew Sisters, croons through beautiful hymns, then boo-boo-boos his way through novelty songs such as "Mele Kalikimaka." It’s no wonder that Merry Christmas is the best-selling Christmas album of all time.

 

cd 1.JPGSteven Isaac, online editor: Sara Groves has a great Christmas album called O Holy Night, and we listen to it every year over and over and over again. One of our favorite songs on that album is called "Toy Packaging." It’s a fabulous little song all about the package the toy comes in. It reminds us of what’s really important at Christmastime.

 

Bob Smithouser, senior editor: First and foremost on my family’s list is the soundtrack to A Charlie Brown Christmas by the Vince Guaraldi Trio. It really ushers us into the season. Hearing that young choir sing "Christmas Time Is Here" almost feels like an official proclamation that advent has indeed begun (even if stores have had decorations up since Halloween). Masterful piano work. Relaxingly upbeat. It’s just the perfect Christmas album. Our family tradition for trimming the tree includes a pot of hot cocoa and that CD.

 

Adam Holz, senior associate editor: In our family we really like Christmas Eve and Other Stories by the Trans-Siberian Orchestra. It’s an ’80s metal band that sort of morphed into this Christmas and holiday band. That particular album, the band’s first, is a collection of 17 songs. It’s a mixture of traditional Christian hymns and more contemporary stuff. Some of the tracks are instrumental. It’s heavy, but our family really likes it.

 

Kevin Simpson, graphic designer/game reviewer: I love Elvis’ Christmas Album, released in 1957. I can do without the few songs about Santa and sleigh bells, but the rest of it is pure Elvis. It just doesn’t get any better than his rendition of "Blue Christmas." And "I’ll Be Home for Christmas" always chokes me up a bit—makes me think of Dad reading to us from the second chapter of Luke. "O Little Town of Bethlehem" as sung by the King of Rock & Roll is simply epic. The thing I like most about this album is that four old-school gospel songs made the cut. Now that’s a CHRISTmas record!

 

elvis2.jpgBob Waliszewski, Plugged In director: Skip Ewing’s country disc Following Yonder Star is right up there at the top of our list of Christmas favorites. I especially love the song "It Wasn’t His Child," which talks of a young man accepting the baby of the woman he loves, even though it isn’t his. And we come to find out that man is Joseph. There are other original songs, plus classic carols such as "O Come All Ye Faithful," "The Little Drummer Boy" and "Silent Night."

 

Jesse Florea, contributing editor: Rivertribe Christmas is one of the most unique Christmas CDs on the market. A group of Christians from Australia, Rivertribe released this instrumental Christmas album in 2003. With its interesting instrumentation and unusual arrangements, it makes for relaxing background music as didgeridoo and other unconventional instruments put you in the Christmas spirit.  You’ve never heard "The First Noel," "We Three Kings," "Silent Night" and other Christmas classics played like this.

 

Meredith Whitmore, associate editor: My favorite Christmas album is absolutely A Charlie Brown Christmas. I’ve lived all over the world, and Christmas looks a lot different in various states or countries without my family. The only constant factors I’ve had are "Linus and Lucy" (fun to play by ear on the piano) and "Christmas Time Is Here." One of my friends thinks that last song sounds like the kids are whining through sinus infections. But as right as she is about some things, she’s wrong here.

 

Paul Asay, associate editor: I’ve gotta be honest, I’m not a big fan of Christmas music. I don’t know what it is. It just feels a little hokey to me. But when my wife pops out the Christmas CDs, my favorite is always Boogie Woogie Christmas by the Brian Setzer Orchestra. If you like horns, this is for you. It has everything from "Jingle Bells" to "O Holy Night" and even a swing version of "The Nutcracker Suite." Setzer has had other holiday albums, but that’s the one I most enjoy.

 

Well, there you have it. Those are the Christmas CDs members of our team can listen to over and over, year after year. Do you have a perennial favorite? Tell us about it. We’d love to know which albums make your season bright.

1,035 Views 4 Comments Permalink Christmas Music: Our FavesTwitter Facebook Tags: jesus, music, holiday, christmas, cds, elvis, trans-siberian_orchestra, brian_setzer, charlie_brown, rivertribe, skip_ewing, bing_crosby, sara_groves
Gonzo meets Queen. An odd juxtaposition? Maybe so, but it’s also the latest viral video making the rounds, as the Muppets star in an almost frame-for-frame parody of Queen’s rock-opera opus "Bohemian Rhapsody." It’s a clever twist executed to perfection. The video has been viewed more than 10 million times on YouTube, and just this week EMI released both the song and the video for digital download from online retailers.

 

So in hindsight it was probably a good idea to change some of the lyrics.

 

 

In the original version of "Bohemian Rhapsody," Freddie Mercury sings, "Mama, [I] just killed a man/Put a gun against his head, pulled my trigger now he’s dead/Mama, life has just begun/But now I’ve gone and thrown it all away."

 

In the Muppet video, Animal gets as far as "Mama" before getting his needle stuck on that single word, exploring its emotional resonance until the song is able to resume at a point more appropriate for the Sesame Street crowd. That artistic decision shows a lot of sensitivity. And it’s probably wise. I mean, what parent of a preschooler tuning in to see Kermit wants to have to explain a homicide?

 

Nevertheless, it occurred to me that slightly older children might actually benefit from Queen’s original lyrics. At a time when popular music (rap in particular) often cheapens life by glamorizing murder and making gunplay sound heroic, "Bohemian Rhapsody" does just the opposite, providing a healthy dose of reality. It points out that killing another person carries consequences. It can’t be undone. There’s anguish and regret in Mercury’s voice as he realizes that his violent choice means the end of his own life and untold grief for his mother. In short, the song is a cautionary tale that reinforces Exodus 20:13 and Galatians 6:7, much like another pop hit from the 1970s, Styx’s "Renegade."

 

The bigger question we’re left with is this: At what point should we shift from protecting our children from the ugliness of the world to preparing them for its harsh realities by using the parables of secular media to illustrate biblical truth?

1,609 Views 1 Comments Permalink Muppets, Messages and 'Mama'Twitter Facebook Tags: music, discernment, internet, culture, youtube, muppets, viral_video, queen
bieber.JPGFor the record, I don’t believe tweens should live in a protective bubble, completely isolated from the culture. But as a father of preteens, I’m tempted to run a search for "protective bubbles" on Craigslist whenever I hear pop songs destined to heighten children’s sexual self-awareness too soon—especially when those lyrics come from artists who should be too young to understand what they’re singing about. Case in point: Justin Bieber.

 

The 15-year-old Canadian is an interesting success story. At the age of 12 he posted videos of himself singing on YouTube, mainly so he could share them with family and friends. But they became a viral phenomenon, and Usher signed him to a contract that has already paid huge dividends. Bieber recently released his first CD, My World, and while it contains a handful of fairly benign pop/R&B love songs, a tune called "First Dance" left me shaking my head in disbelief.

 

As the song opens, a boy daydreams about taking a special girl to the prom and asking for the first dance. OK so far. But a closer listen suggests that the slow dance he’s interested in involves more than just dancing. The chorus says, "Give the first dance to me/I promise I’ll be gentle/I know we gotta do it slowly … I’m gon’ cherish every moment ’cause it only happens once in a lifetime."

 

Hmmm.

 

I still might be tempted to give him the benefit of the doubt, except that, if we take the song at face value, what are we supposed to do with lines such as "Ain’t no chaperones/This could be the night of your dreams" and "No teachers around to see us dancing close/I’m telling you, our parents will never know."? Don’t Mom and Dad know you’re at the prom … and that proms involve dancing? If Bieber is only talking about what happens on the gym floor under the glitter ball, what’s he trying to hide from the girl’s parents?

 

It sounds to me like he’s asking for her virginity which, considering what prom night has become for many teens, would fit the profile.

 

What do you think? Am I overreacting, or is this another example of entertainment introducing kids to sexual themes that they’re not old enough to understand?

1,637 Views 2 Comments Permalink When Is a 'First Dance' Not a First Dance?Twitter Facebook Tags: teens, music, culture, protect, justin_bieber, prom, dance
Dads are important.  And there are right and wrong ways to be one.  That message was communicated loud and clear over the weekend by two sets of filmmakers, one in Hollywood, Calif., the other in Albany, Ga. And yet their projects couldn’t be more different.

 

The hot new disaster flick, 2012, depicts the end of the world in eye-poppingly cataclysmic fashion, aided by a huge budget and gaudy special effects.  It also alludes to the devastation wreaked on families when dads aren’t present in the home, become disengaged, or model poor character. The protagonist, played by John Cusack, is estranged from his wife and two young children. But by the end of the film, he heroically reconnects with them, regaining their respect while rescuing them from more than just Armageddon.

 

He’s not the only onscreen patriarch in need of redemption here.  Minor characters, aware that the end is near, try to make peace with their kids long-distance or find themselves making supreme sacrifices. What 2012 fails to explore, however, is why those flawed fathers fell from grace in the first place, or what practical steps a man can take to avoid or repair damaged relationships at home.

 

That’s where Sherwood Pictures comes in.

 

Courageous.JPGShortly after screening 2012, I hopped a flight to southwest Georgia, where the folks at Sherwood Baptist Church unveiled plans for their next theatrical release, which will probably be produced and distributed for about what 2012 spent on catering. You know Sherwood Pictures. That’s the ministry behind sleeper hits such as Fireproof and Facing the Giants. During a Sunday evening service devoted largely to prayer and worship, director Alex Kendrick (pictured third from the left, along with brother Stephen Kendrick, Jim McBride and Sherwood’s senior pastor Michael Catt) and his creative team introduced the concept for Courageous.

 

"The movie is about fatherhood," Kendrick says. "Four fathers in law enforcement go through a terrible tragedy. They begin looking at their commitment to ’protect and serve’ as it relates to their role as fathers, challenging one another to fulfill God’s intention for fathers." Then they start a Bible study and everyone lives happily ever after, right? Not so fast. Just as only some seed found fertile soil in the parable of the sower (Luke 8:1-15), these officers face challenges, and not all will experience lasting change.

 

Could Courageous do for fatherhood what Fireproof has done for marriages? I sure hope so. So does executive pastor/producer Jim McBride, best known to audiences as fiery football coach Bobby Lee Duke in Facing the Giants. McBride said, "The statistics on fatherless children are devastating. And because the family is the building block of society, one important place to rebuild families is through fathers who stay and lead and love."

 

I don’t know about you, but I’m pumped. Courageous begins shooting in the spring of 2010, and is due in theaters sometime in 2011. Which is a good thing. Because if the world really does end in 2012, at least dads who’ve seen Courageous will have had plenty of time to get their houses in order.

 

What do you think about the unique movie ministry of Sherwood Pictures? If you’re looking forward to Courageous or if you’ve been touched by their previous films, tell us about it!

3,496 Views 3 Comments Permalink From 'Fireproof' to FatherhoodTwitter Facebook Tags: family, fathers, movies, christian_entertainment, sherwood_baptist

Perhaps inspired by the exploits of Miley Cyrus, Zac Efron and others over the past year, Disney now requires all its up-and-coming young stars to attend Talent 101, which is designed to prepare them for the pressures (and temptations?) of celebrity life. The faculty includes security experts, psychologists and media consultants who’ll help young performers handle everything from pushy journalists to rabid fans.

 

disney.JPGThe actual curriculum hasn’t been made public, but I suspect lessons might include “Things Better Left Unsaid,” “Recognizing an Immodest Photo Shoot” and “Dances to Avoid at Awards Shows.” (Miley got a crash course in those subjects from the school of hard knocks.) Let’s face it, being in show business is a challenge. Preserving a wholesome, Disney image in a world resembling Pleasure Island is even harder. These kids need all the help they can get.

 

Some people might argue that this isn’t about the kids at all. Rather, it’s simply the Disney Machine’s self-serving attempt to avoid public relations headaches and protect its sizable investment in pop icons likely to have their faces plastered on half the products at your local Walmart. That’s the cynical take, but it could be accurate.

 

I’m in no position to judge anyone’s motives. All I can say is that, as a father of two preteens, I kinda like the idea of coaching young celebs to stay safe, grounded and out of the tabloids. I mean, is it so awful to remind them that they have a responsibility to the people giving them the platform to live out their dreams? To Disney? To corporate partners? To parents? To young fans?

 

I also hope that Talent 101 includes a unit on “How to Cope If I Don’t Become the Next Selena Gomez.” That would speak volumes about Disney’s genuine, long-term concern for its stable of young talent.

1,034 Views 0 Comments Permalink Disney's Crash Course in CelebrityTwitter Facebook Tags: education, celebrity, miley_cyrus, disney, selena_gomez
baseball.JPGWith the Major League Baseball playoffs in full swing, I thought I’d share my Top 5 most-recommended baseball movies for family viewing.

 

It’s not your typical "favorites" list. To make it to first base, films needed to be entertaining and uplifting. Promoting solid family ties was a plus, too. And while very few films are perfect, the ones in this lineup couldn’t be weighed down by excessive problematic content. With those ground rules in mind, I’ve tried to include a little something for everyone. So here’s the windup and the pitch …

 

5. Everyone’s Hero (G) An animated comedy/adventure about a young boy’s quest to recover Babe Ruth’s lucky bat, which is stolen by a win-at-all-costs rival during the playoffs. Not a cinematic home run, but this innocent cross-country quest (with a talking bat and ball) is a bloop single bolstered by warm family bonds and a refreshing nod to the Negro Leagues. Great for little ones not distracted by pedestrian dialogue or an absurd finale that puts a 10-year-old up to bat in the World Series. Harmless and sweet.

 

4. Angels in the Outfield (PG) A foster child asks his deadbeat dad when they’ll be a family again. "When the Angels win the pennant," Dad says sarcastically, knowing that they stink. So young Roger prays for a pennant. Suddenly, real angels are influencing ballgames. And since only Roger can see them, he becomes a mascot of sorts for a team—and a combustible manager—in need of redemption. Despite a few mild profanities early and some fuzzy theology, it’s a fun film with lots of life lessons, assuming parents step up to the plate to engage their kids.

 

3. Eight Men Out (PG) Prior to steroids, the game’s darkest hour was the Black Sox Scandal of 1919, when a few greedy, disgruntled members of the heavily favored Chicago White Sox accepted bribes to throw the World Series. It’s a smartly written, well-acted film that’s also a terrific cautionary tale about the slippery slope of temptation and compromise. There’s a fair amount of profanity for a PG film (including one f-bomb), but for mature audiences it’s well worth seeing in its "edited for television" form, or with the help of filtering software.

 

2. The Pride of the Yankees (NR) Nominated for 11 Academy Awards in 1942, this moving biopic chronicles the rise and untimely death of legendary Yankee slugger Lou Gehrig. It captures the dignity he showed while battling the terminal illness that now bears his name. But more than an inspirational film about a courageous man, it’s a glimpse at baseball’s golden age, with Babe Ruth and Bill Dickey appearing as themselves.  Don’t be surprised if you get choked up during Gehrig’s "luckiest man on the face of the earth" speech.

 

1. The Rookie (G) This is the true story of Texas science teacher/baseball coach Jim Morris, whose dream of pitching in the majors ended with a series of arm injuries. Years later, when his unmotivated high school players realize he can still throw smoke, they make him promise that, if they win a championship, he’ll try out again. They do. He does. And the 35-year-old rookie gets another shot. The stuff on the diamond is great. Even more endearing are glimpses of Morris’s family life and the small-town folk who support him.

 

Well, those are just some of my favorites—the Top 5 I find myself recommending to people who love the smell of movie theater popcorn and a freshly oiled fielder’s glove. Let me know what you think of these picks, and share a few of your own. We also discuss these films on our new audio podcast. Check it out. And maybe I’ll see you at the ballpark!

1,010 Views 3 Comments Permalink Take Me Out to the MoviesTwitter Facebook Tags: family, discernment, sports, movies, baseball

Way Out West

Posted by Bob_Smithouser Sep 23, 2009

Rapper Kanye West made a fool of himself at this year’s MTV Video Music Awards by jumping onstage during Taylor Swift’s acceptance speech, grabbing the mic and telling everyone that he thought Beyonce’s video was better. Swift was dumbstruck. The crowd’s boos hammered West like an icy rain, obviously surprising him while leaving no doubt that he’d crossed a line. 

 

There’s a very important lesson here. When artists get paid big bucks to spew unfiltered, controversial opinions in their lyrics, they can delude themselves into thinking anything goes. That the world is their stage to be seized whenever the urge hits. That they can say what they want when they want.  Well, Kanye West got a dose of reality when he was rude to Taylor Swift. He learned that even on MTV there are, in a sense, “community standards.” Freedom of speech has limits, and it carries responsibility.
421 Views 0 Comments Permalink Way Out WestTwitter Facebook Tags: boundaries, music, rap, awards, civility, mtv, kanye, west, taylor, swift