My, What Pointy Ears You Have
- Reply
As both an original Star Trek and Lord of the Rings fan, I can honestly say that neither show has inspired me to get pointy ears. It's overall unnecessary, and a sign of how far the whole "be your true self" trend is going. What's next, surgical devil horns made out of bone? No wait...
Good grief. And I thought tongue rings were bad. This is what we have to look forward to next? *shakes head* Sadly I'm not even suprised. What's next after "elf ears?" I can only imagine.....
Why do we focus all of our attention on 'the world'? Why do we criticize/demonize these celebrities who choose to make decisions about themselves and their bodies? I'm not denying the fact that they are role models to some but we should consider the fact that the people being 'inspired' by them are a VERY small proportion of the population.
I hate to get all technical here, but these 'inspired' people are NOT statistically significant to draw ANY kind of causal relationship. You cannot claim that Lady Gaga walking around with horns is making people go out and get one too.
Let me just say that I'm glad Houtz mentioned Lord of the Rings as also 'inspiring' body modification because too often we delude ourselves into thinking that its the 'secular' world that is driving all the craziness. PluggedIn has spoken highly of the film series and Tolkien and I believe we should think deeply about how we tend to separate content from perceived intention. Just because LOTR is a positive film with positive messages doesn't mean it can't inspire bad things...and just because Lady Gaga is promoting gay rights and wearing horns doesn't mean she's pure evil.
Anything and Everything that is good or perceived to be good can be corrupted.
Heh. I guess I get to be the minority vote here this time.
Pointy ears... Not something I'd do myself, but I don't think those who do it are being any worse than silly. I mean, it's not as far out of the ordinary for human appearance as y'all are making out--I've met people who've got mild ear-pointing just as a normal genetic mutation or whatever--and plus that, as far as blowing money on a permanent fashion statement which is going to divide opinions when people see you, I hear young people talking next to me about the probably cost of their next tattoo on a fairly regular basis.
Multiple cartilage piercings, tattooed arms--elf ears (or Vulcan, if you will) aren't much farther off the wall than that, to my mind, and a lot less serious than so much of the plastic surgery you hear about. Asking in all seriousness, not as a parody or making fun, is pluggedin ever planning to run an article on infections in cartilage piercing in general, or on the permanence of tattoos and what inspires people to get them? Because other than being a mite more geeky, I don't see how this news is very different from either of the above.
Well, now, that depends on how you define "bad," doesn't it, Anon?
Merriam Webster's definitions include unhealthy, unfavorable, unpleasant, and morally wrong. I think one would be hard pressed to defend a position of body mod being morally wrong. But can it be physically unhealthy, though? Yep. Can it potentially produce unfavorable impressions for you in first encounter situations and job interviews? Probably. Can it be unpleasant? Any negative health side effects can be, forking over money for it which you could be spending on other things can be, and looking at yourself years later after your tastes have changed and realizing you're stuck with it can also be.
If you want a full debate case with quotes and evidences, that would take me some time, but I think I can say while holding to a reasonable level of logic that body mod may situationally correspond with some dictionary-accepted definitions for "bad." ![]()
But ear-piercing, makeup, and hair products can be unhealthy too. While I agree that an extreme cosmetic surgery is perhaps an unwise decision due to the equally extreme health risks, removing a bit of your ear is hardly on the same level.
And if someone is willing to judge you so severely purely on the basis of your physical appearance, I’m pretty sure the problem is on his or her side of the equation, not yours.
And the other consequences you list apply to pretty much anything, from moving to a different city to buying a new mattress. Many people undergo surgery for other reasons that are not actually life-threatening, such as to improve eyesight or improve their breathing at night. These have negative side effects, but these surgeries make their life more enjoyable. I'm sure that, for some people, having pointy ears does so as well. Once again, I don't see how that's a bad thing.
Please convince me otherwise, but this is what every statement I’ve read here against minor body modifications like this seems to me to boil down to this: these modifications do not fit into my version of what culture should be, and so must be detrimental. I, frankly, do not want to live in a society defined by cultural norms like that, norms that have no perceivable basis in concrete fact. I don’t see any real medical reason these can be called “bad,” any research indicating negative effects on personality, and certainly no valid theological reason. So, when I say bad, I mean bad on a scientific (for lack of a better word) basis, not on the basis of constantly-shifting cultural norms.
I find it interesting that this post gets so many responses. More people seemed to be concerned about the relatively small number of people choosing to get body modification than in kindergarteners being given ipads (based on number and speed of comments posted). Not commenting on merits of either, just where priorities seem to be.
Just out of curiosity, Jo, does your argument only apply where aesthetics is the goal, or also where a person makes a significant change to themselves (or has one made) in the name of medicine/science?
If a person is born with retinal difficulties which can be fixed by an operation, or with a club foot, or other medical issues, then in your opinion may those be morally changed? How about those banner adds you see of the kids with the cleft palette--donate here to give him a better life?
And if recoloring or altering the costume/painting is morally wrong, then is there something immoral in hiding that costume/painting when we dress every morning? Granting, of course, that either way in our world hiding the costume/painting is probably required to keep your brother from stumbling in most countries.
I'm really not trying to be annoying here. I'm just curious whether you are arguing just for avoiding changi yourself because you wish to,changing the apparent design for any reason. Or perhaps there's a nuuanance between the two which I have missed. ![]()