Currently Being Moderated
18

My, What Pointy Ears You Have

Posted by Meredith_Whitmore on Apr 19, 2011 9:23:35 AM

pointy ear.JPGOK, I'll admit it. Back when such things were more unusual, I flinched imperceptibly—I hope—whenever I noticed hooks in someone's eyebrow or massive gauges in their earlobes. And when I saw my first surgically split tongue, the sighting caused my knees to sway like a dancing lady tattoo on a biker's stomach.

 

Today, about 15 years later, body modification is so commonplace that I'm no longer shocked by much of anything—until recently. A few weeks ago I saw a pair of elf-like ears on an otherwise ordinary looking woman who was standing in line at a restaurant. A clever double take while hiding behind a tall friend was in order. (Yep. They were real and as pointy as the ear was long.)

 

At the time, I thought it might just be my own dazed and confused state (after all, I'd recently reviewed Jersey Shore). But now, after reading several news stories on "elf ears," I can trust my eyes. I think she'd had her ear cartilage surgically altered.

 

The procedure is called ear pointing, and over the last decade or so it's been gaining in popularity. Phoenix resident Jordan Houtz considered having it done for 18 months before taking the plunge. The pixie-eared young woman told CBS News, "[Ear pointing] fit my personality, I've always been into the sci-fi sort of thing, and, I don't know, it clicked for me. Some people think it's the coolest thing and some people think it's ridiculous—and you have to respect that. It is definitely not for the faint of heart. It's not something I would recommend doing unless you're very, very sure."

 

Make that super duper, never-waffle, go-to-the-grave-with-it positive, because the procedure cannot be reversed. It's also susceptible to deformities, infections and other complications that could destroy the ear entirely.

 

So why do folks do it? Body modification artist Steve Haworth told CBS, "There's a lot of people out there who have an inner vision of themselves and they want to express that to the world around them."

 

I think it's interesting that Houtz also mentioned that The Lord of the Rings was a huge factor in her pro-modification decision. In fact, I'd venture that much of the inner vision Haworth mentions comes from Hollywood. Hey, sci-fi fans and Tolkien movie lovers might think, If Liv Tyler can look enchanting as Arwen and Spock can have the conn, why can't we live the dream, too?

 

People relate deeply to characters, it's true. But if Hollywood is influencing some to make dangerous, painful and irreversible decisions about their body, I wonder if it's a dream or an occasional delusion.

 

Editor's note: Click here to read about Lady Gaga's alleged body modification.

5,586 Views Twitter Facebook Tags: influence, surgery, lord_of_the_rings, body_modification, pointy_ears


Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Apr 19, 2011 10:47 AM Guest Gracie  says:
I just don't understand why people would do such a thing, especially with the risk of infection and mutilation. Let me reword that, for any reason, why? why? why?
Apr 19, 2011 11:17 AM Guest YetAnotherTeen  says:

As both an original Star Trek and Lord of the Rings fan, I can honestly say that neither show has inspired me to get pointy ears. It's overall unnecessary, and a sign of how far the whole "be your true self" trend is going. What's next, surgical devil horns made out of bone? No wait...

Apr 19, 2011 11:40 AM Guest Lord of the Rings Fan  says in response to YetAnotherTeen:
Wow. I have to say that I have often wished in a moment of book or movie wonder to have elf ears, but I never thought of surgery. Personally, I would just go for the costume ears that were used in the movies and leave the possibility of PERMANENT MAIMING somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
Apr 19, 2011 11:44 AM Guest Ley  says:

Good grief. And I thought tongue rings were bad. This is what we have to look forward to next? *shakes head* Sadly I'm not even suprised. What's next after "elf ears?" I can only imagine.....

Apr 19, 2011 3:57 PM kate kate    says:

Why do we focus all of our attention on 'the world'? Why do we criticize/demonize these celebrities who choose to make decisions about themselves and their bodies? I'm not denying the fact that they are role models to some but we should consider the fact that the people being 'inspired' by them are a VERY small proportion of the population.

I hate to get all technical here, but these 'inspired' people are NOT statistically significant to draw ANY kind of causal relationship. You cannot claim that Lady Gaga walking around with horns is making people go out and get one too.

 

Let me just say that I'm glad Houtz mentioned Lord of the Rings as also 'inspiring' body modification because too often we delude ourselves into thinking that its the 'secular' world that is driving all the craziness. PluggedIn has spoken highly of the film series and Tolkien and I believe we should think deeply about how we tend to separate content from perceived intention. Just because LOTR is a positive film with positive messages doesn't mean it can't inspire bad things...and just because Lady Gaga is promoting gay rights and wearing horns doesn't mean she's pure evil.

 

Anything and Everything that is good or perceived to be good can be corrupted.

Apr 19, 2011 4:34 PM Guest Hithwenur  says:

Heh. I guess I get to be the minority vote here this time.

 

Pointy ears... Not something I'd do myself, but I don't think those who do it are being any worse than silly. I mean, it's not as far out of the ordinary for human appearance as y'all are making out--I've met people who've got mild ear-pointing just as a normal genetic mutation or whatever--and plus that, as far as blowing money on a permanent fashion statement which is going to divide opinions when people see you, I hear young people talking next to me about the probably cost of their next tattoo on a fairly regular basis.

 

Multiple cartilage piercings, tattooed arms--elf ears (or Vulcan, if you will) aren't much farther off the wall than that, to my mind, and a lot less serious than so much of the plastic surgery you hear about. Asking in all seriousness, not as a parody or making fun, is pluggedin ever planning to run an article on infections in cartilage piercing in general, or on the permanence of tattoos and what inspires people to get them? Because other than being a mite more geeky, I don't see how this news is very different from either of the above.

Apr 19, 2011 4:50 PM Guest Anon  says:
Can someone explain to me logically why body modification is a bad thing?
Apr 19, 2011 5:50 PM Guest YetAnotherTeen  says:
I wasn't criticizing the act, I was criticizing their (well, for some of them) justification, which is that "they're like this inside, and want to be like it on the outside." The idea of pointy ears in itself is merely pointless, not wrong.
Apr 19, 2011 7:20 PM TheFuturePredator TheFuturePredator    says:
Well, I'm gonna be joining the minority vote by stating that I actually think this is a pretty cool idea and I can certainly understand why many people would like to undergo the procedure. I fail to see why reasons such as self-expression and 'finding it asthetically pleasing' are bad reasons. Yes, it may be "unnecessary", but if we're to be honest with ourselves, isn't ear-piercing and tattoos? If people are willing to undergo it and live it with the rest of their lives, it's their choice. Personally, I'm really intrigued with the idea and, to be honest, wouldn't mind getting undergoing it sometime when i'm in college. Why? Because, being an avid lover of fiction and an aspiring writer myself, fiction and the worlds that reside in it have become a determining factor of my life. some people may have a problem with that, but i personally enjoy it and hence, find the entire concept of body modification both asthetically pleasing and, if you will, an avenue for self-expression. Am i going to do something as radical as transform myself into the next lizard man? No. But the idea of say, elf-ears, appeals to me both asthetically and as a method of personal inspiration. Ultimately, I don't find the idea any different than ear-piercing or tattooing.
Apr 19, 2011 7:47 PM Guest Hithwenur  says in response to Anon:

Well, now, that depends on how you define "bad," doesn't it, Anon?

 

Merriam Webster's definitions include unhealthy, unfavorable, unpleasant, and morally wrong. I think one would be hard pressed to defend a position of body mod being morally wrong. But can it be physically unhealthy, though? Yep. Can it potentially produce unfavorable impressions for you in first encounter situations and job interviews? Probably.  Can it be unpleasant? Any negative health side effects can be, forking over money for it which you could be spending on other things can be, and looking at yourself years later after your tastes have changed and realizing you're stuck with it can also be.

 

If you want a full debate case with quotes and evidences, that would take me some time, but I think I can say while holding to a reasonable level of logic that body mod may situationally correspond with some dictionary-accepted definitions for "bad."

Apr 19, 2011 8:39 PM Guest Grant  says in response to kate:
Wow. Well spoken and I agree with all that you said!
Apr 19, 2011 11:03 PM Guest Anon  says in response to Hithwenur:

But ear-piercing, makeup, and hair products can be unhealthy too. While I agree that an extreme cosmetic surgery is perhaps an unwise decision due to the equally extreme health risks, removing a bit of your ear is hardly on the same level.

 

And if someone is willing to judge you so severely purely on the basis of your physical appearance, I’m pretty sure the problem is on his or her side of the equation, not yours.

 

And the other consequences you list apply to pretty much anything, from moving to a different city to buying a new mattress. Many people undergo surgery for other reasons that are not actually life-threatening, such as to improve eyesight or improve their breathing at night. These have negative side effects, but these surgeries make their life more enjoyable. I'm sure that, for some people, having pointy ears does so as well. Once again, I don't see how that's a bad thing.

 

Please convince me otherwise, but this is what every statement I’ve read here against minor body modifications like this seems to me to boil down to this: these modifications do not fit into my version of what culture should be, and so must be detrimental. I, frankly, do not want to live in a society defined by cultural norms like that, norms that have no perceivable basis in concrete fact. I don’t see any real medical reason these can be called “bad,” any research indicating negative effects on personality, and certainly no valid theological reason. So, when I say bad, I mean bad on a scientific (for lack of a better word) basis, not on the basis of constantly-shifting cultural norms.

Apr 20, 2011 6:37 AM Guest Terry  says:

I find it interesting that this post gets so many responses.  More people seemed to be concerned about the relatively small number of people choosing to get body modification than in kindergarteners being given ipads (based on number and speed of comments posted).  Not commenting on merits of either, just where priorities seem to be.

Apr 25, 2011 7:17 AM Jazzy_99 Jazzy_99    says:

How gross! Why would anyone want that?

Apr 25, 2011 1:23 PM Guest Hithwenur  says in response to Jazzy_99:
Personal taste or a proclamation of identity, same as why anybody would want a piercing, a tattoo, or a radical change or hair color. I think some of the tattoos I've seen are in bad taste, but it's still an individual's choice whether they think it's worth their money and to some people their reputation to get one. And more to the point, with the number of dedicated fandoms for franchises containing elves (especially LotR and fantasy MMORPGs), it would be analogous to getting a large, obvious tattoo of something from a favorite book or movie.
May 1, 2011 1:45 PM Guest Jo  says in response to Anon:
Because God made us all the way we are on purpose. It's like someone making a costume or painting for you personally as a gift, and you decide you don't like it or people won't like it, so you cut it up, sew it up, recolor it, etc., which is insulting to the artist.
May 3, 2011 5:30 AM Guest Hithwenur  says in response to Jo:

Just out of curiosity, Jo, does your argument only apply where aesthetics is the goal, or also where a person makes a significant change to themselves (or has one made) in the name of medicine/science?

 

If a person is born with retinal difficulties which can be fixed by an operation, or with a club foot, or other medical issues, then in your opinion may those be morally changed? How about those banner adds you see of the kids with the cleft palette--donate here to give him a better life?

 

And if recoloring or altering the costume/painting is morally wrong, then is there something immoral in hiding that costume/painting when we dress every morning? Granting, of course, that either way in our world hiding the costume/painting is probably required to keep your brother from stumbling in most countries.

 

I'm really not trying to be annoying here. I'm  just curious whether you are arguing just for avoiding  changi yourself because you wish to,changing the apparent design for any reason. Or perhaps there's a nuuanance between the two which I have missed.

May 3, 2011 5:55 PM Guest Hithwenur  says in response to Hithwenur:
Sorry-- that last bit should read "changing yourself just because you wish  to, or changing the apparent design for any reason. Or perhaps there's a  nuance between the two which I have missed." My keyboard's been acting up lately.